The universe is filled with thermal radiation that has a blackbody spectrum at an effective temperature of 2.7 K. What is the wavelength of light that corresponds to the peak in \(S_\lambda\) (\(S_\lambda\) is the spectral distribution with respect to wavelength)? In what region of the electromagnetic spectrum is this peak wavelength?
The peak wavelength of a blackbody spectrum depends on temperature, following the relationship \(\lambda _{\text{max} }=hc/(4.96k_B T)\). This is sometimes refered to as Wien's displacement law. The order of magnitude, \(\lambda _{\text{max}} \approx hc/(k_B T)\), can be estimated by noting that the strongest light emission will come from the highest frequency oscillators, with the caveat that photon energy won't go much beyond \(k_B T\). The precise numerical factor, 4.96, can be found by differentiating Planck's law with respect to wavelength to find the maximum.
For a temperature of \(2.7 \text{ K}\) the peak wavelength is \(\lambda_{\max }=1.1 \text{ mm}\). This in the microwave region of the EM spectrum, which is why this is often called the cosmic microwave background radiation. The boundary between microwaves, high frequency radio waves, terahertz, and far-IR light are not well defined. It could be argued to be in any of these regions, but it's most commonly associated with microwaves.
Download the file extraterr_solar.csv, which is in comma-separated-variable (csv) format. Open the csv file in a spreadsheet program such as Excel. The data is the spectral intensity with respect to wavelength, \(S_\lambda\), for the sunlight that is hitting a satellite above the earth. The first column is wavelength in units of nanometers. The second column is spectral intensity in units of W/(m\(^2\cdot\)nm).
The numerical integration is performing \(\sum_{i=1}^{N} I_{\lambda, i} \cdot \Delta \lambda\) where \(I_{\lambda, i}\) is the \(i^{\text { th }}\) value of spectral intensity and \(\Delta \lambda=5\) nm. In Excel I used the formula =5*SUM(B1:B745). Performing this sum yields a total energy flux of \(I=1348 \frac{\mathrm{W}}{\mathrm{m}^{2}}.\)
Consider a narrow band of wavelengths, from 552.5 nm to 557.5 nm. (The bandwidth is 5 nm and the central wavelength is 555 nm). All the photons in this bandwidth have very similar energy, \(E_{\text{photon}} \approx\) (1240 nm\(\cdot\)eV)/(555 nm). How many photons per second per \(\text{m}^2\) are in this spectral band of sunlight? Explain your method using standard mathmeatical notation. Additionally, write down the formula that you entered into the spreadsheet.
The spectral intensity at 555 \(\mathrm{nm}\) is 1.86\(\frac{\mathrm{W}}{\mathrm{nm\cdot m}^{2}}\) and the photon energy is 2.23 \(\mathrm{eV}\). Multiplying the spectral intensity by the 5 nm spectral width and dividing by the photon energy gives a photon flux of \(I_{\mathrm{ph}}=2.6 \times 10^{19} \frac{\text { photons }}{\mathrm{s} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{2}}\). In Excel I used the formula =5*B56/(1.6E-19*1240/A56)
The calculation that you did for part b can now be applied to every row in your spreadsheet. You will need these numbers for part c.
In my spreadsheet I created column C which lists the number of photons in each spectral bin. I summed the photon numbers in these spectral bins, starting at a photon energy of 1.1 eV and going up to the highest photon energy (around 4.3 eV). In Excel I used the formula =SUM(C1:C170). The result is \(3.38 \times 10^{21} \frac{\text { photons }}{\mathrm{s} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{2}}\).
The power per area generated by the silicon solar cell is the total photon flux above the 1.1 eV cutoff (the result from part d) multiplied by the energy that can be harvested from each photon which is \(1.1 \mathrm{eV}=1.76 \times 10^{-19} \mathrm{J}\). Performing this calculation yields a total power per area of \(596 \frac{\mathrm{W}}{\mathrm{m}^{2}}.\)
The ratio of the power per area found in part e) to the intensity of sunlight found in part a) is 44\(\%\). The rest of the sun's energy is either not absorbed, \(24\%\), or turned into heat inside the silicon, \(32\%\).
This homework question is a coarse-grained model that respects the basic operating principle of a solar cell. However, it is not the complete story. The true efficiency limit for a solar cell made from a single pn junction, operating with natural solar intensity is about 33%.To understand this fully, we should study the physics of pn junctions. Then we would know the max volage we could expect from the solar cell (it is slightly less than the bandgap voltage). We would also know how much current we could extract without drastically diminishing the voltage. (The current must be slightly smaller than 1 electron per absorbed photon).
Shockley & Queisser published such calculations in 1961. The paper is 10 pages long. On page 3 they present a zeroth-order estimate, which is consistent with this homework question: \begin{align} &\text{``ultimate efficiency''}\notag\\ &=x_g\left(\int_{x_g}^{\infty}\frac{x^2\ dx}{e^x - 1}\right)/\left(\int_0^{\infty}\frac{x^3\ dx}{e^x -1}\right) \end{align} where \(x_g = E_{gap}/(k_\text{B} T_{sun})\) and \(T_{sun} \approx 6000\text{ K}\). The integrands in this equation come from Planck's law. The maximum efficiency, \(44\%\), occurs at \(E_{gap} = 1.1\text{ eV}\). The next 7 pages of Shockley & Queisser's paper considers the details of a real pn junction, with the fundamental limitations of working at room temperature with a limited intensity of solar radiation. They arrived at a limit of 33%.
Balanced energy rates Rate in = Rate out
\begin{align} &\text{1. whole system} \quad P_{\text{sun}} = 0.3 P_{\text{sun}} + P_{\text{up,}2}\\ &\text{2. Earth surface} \quad P_{\text{sun}} + P_{\text{down,}1} = 0.3 P_{\text{sun}} + P_{\text{surf}}\\ &\text{3. Plexiglass 1} \quad P_{\text{surf}} + P_{\text{down,}2} = P_{\text{down,}1} + P_{\text{up,}1}\\ &\text{4. Plexiglass 2} \quad P_{\text{up,}1} = P_{\text{down,}2} + P_{\text{up,}2}\\ &\text{where } \quad P_{\text{sun}} = \pi R_{\text{earth}}^2 I_{\text{sun}}\\ &\qquad \qquad P_{\text{up,}2} = P_{\text{down,}2} = \sigma T_2^4\ 4 \pi R_{\text{earth}}^2\\ &\qquad \qquad P_{\text{up,}1} = P_{\text{down,}1} = \sigma T_1^4\ 4 \pi R_{\text{earth}}^2\\ &\qquad \qquad P_{\text{surf}} = \sigma T_{\text{surf}}^4\ 4 \pi R_{\text{earth}}^2 \end{align}
First solve for \(T_2\) by looking at the whole system: \begin{align} P_{in} = P_{out}\\ P_{\text{sun}} = P_{\text{reflected}} + P_{\text{reradiated}}\\ P_{\text{sun}} &= 0.3 P_{\text{sun}} + P_{\text{up,}2}\\ 0.7 \pi R_{\text{earth}}^2 I_{\text{sun}} &= \sigma T_2^4\ 4\pi R_{\text{earth}}^2\\ T_2^4 &= \frac{0.7 I_{\text{sun}}}{4\sigma}\\ T_2 &= 255\text{ K} \quad \text{when } I_{\text{sun}} = 1360\text{ W/m}^2 \end{align}
Now solve for \(T_1\) by looking at Plexi 2: \begin{align} P_{\text{up,}1} &= P_{\text{down,}2} + P_{\text{up,}2}\\ \sigma T_1^4\ 4 \pi R_{\text{earth}}^2 &= 2 \sigma T_2^4\ 4 \pi R_{\text{earth}}^2\\ T_1 &= 2^{1/4} T_2\\ &=(1.19)(255\text{ K})\\ &= 303\text{ K} \end{align}
Now solve for \(T_{\text{surf}}\) by looking at Plexi 1: \begin{align} P_{\text{surf}} + P_{\text{down,}2} &= P_{\text{down,}1} + P_{\text{up,}1}\\ \sigma T_{\text{surf}}^4 + \sigma T_2^4 &= 2 \sigma T_1^4\\ T_{\text{surf}}^4 &= 2 (2T_2^4) - T_2^4\\ T_{\text{surf}}^4 &= 3 T_2^4\\ T_{\text{surf}} &= 3^{1/4} T_2\\ &=(1.32)(255\text{ K})\\ &= 336\text{ K} \end{align}